Seven reasons why Collaborative Hiring makes sense

p03jn624

Recently BBC2 broadcast “Who’s the Boss,” - three programmes exploring how companies could transform their recruitment with Collaborative Hiring.

Henry Stewart was a consultant on the programme and was excited to see the idea going out on mainstream TV. Under Collaborative Hiring everybody who will work with a person is involved in the decision on who to appoint. And it tends to mean going beyond the traditional interview, getting the candidates to work with a range of people in the organisation.

In the three companies that go through the process in the series, these are senior appointments and literally everybody in the company is involved in the debate on which is the best candidate. Each member of staff gets an equal vote.

1. Conventional hiring has a poor track record

Laszlo Bock, Head of People at Google, describes (in his book “Work Rules”) the meta analysis conducted by Frank Schmidt and John Hunter on how well assessments predict job performance. Based on 85 years of research they found that the three most common recruitment methods were poor predictors of actual job performance.

They found that years of relevant experience predicted 3% of job performance, reference checks predicted 7% and the normal unstructured interview predicted 14%. Putting them all together is gets you less than a 25% prediction. You would probably do better by tossing a coin.

2. The wisdom of the crowd

One University of Toledo study – again quoted by Bock – found that judgement is often made in the first 10 seconds of an interview, with little basis, and the rest of the time is spent justifying that decision. Other studies have found that decisions are as likely to be based on mutual interests (like Squash or Golf) than on ability to do the job.

You may not get away from instant decisions in collaborative hiring but the wider range of people are likely to balance out any personal prejudice or instant judgement. In “Who’s the Boss”, staff don’t just get to tick a name. We first got them to score each candidate on the key criteria to help ensure decisions were made on likely ability and not just likeability.

3. Everybody is committed to making it work

At Able & Cole, the organic vegetable box delivery company, we helped them introduced collaborative hiring many years ago. Every driver became involved in deciding who was recruited as their manager.

“It took away so much stress,” explained then MD Ella Heeks, who had previously made the hiring decision with the CEO. “Before I would be worried for weeks about whether the person would work out with the team. Now I know everybody is committed to making it work.”

4. The candidates get to meet people and know the company better

With collaborative hiring you get to meet the people you will work with, and get a better understanding of the company you may be joining.
Normally this increases the chances of the person wanting to work with you. But if its clear its not the right company for them, it is far better (for the candidate and the company) to find out at the interview rather than once they’ve started work.

5. Doing  job related tasks

The best predictor of job performance, according to the Schmidt/Hunter study, is a “work sample test,” doing the kind of work you will do in the job. Its still only a 29% predictor so its important to combine it with other factors.

At Happy we always try to test people’s ability in the job. We get potential trainers to train a live class, we get techies to solve technical problems, we get customer service people to deal with realistic (but normally fake) customer phone calls. It gives a real sense of what they will be like in the job.

In “Who’s the Boss,” the candidates do indeed get to do the work, working with staff on production lines, selling to real customers and doing the actual tasks involved in the job. Would you rather ask them questions such as “tell us how you have worked well as part of a team” or see them in action?

6. It is worth it

In “Who’s the Boss” the candidates are on site at the company for a week, being evaluated on a range of tasks. That may seem a big commitment but if it results in hiring the right person, it is a small price to pay.

The cost of hiring the wrong person has been estimated at anywhere between 40% of the salary cost and 3-4 times the salary cost, and can be hugely disruptive.
Collaborative hiring normally involves much more than the standard one hour interview, but it doesn’t have to last a whole week. At the coffee chain Pret a Manger, after an applicant has passed the initial interview, they get to spend a day in a branch of Pret.

At the end of the day the existing team gets to vote on whether to hire them. After a day working with them in that high pressure environment, they have a good idea whether that person would be good to work with and don’t just choose somebody they like.

7. It boosts company morale

In involving everybody (or everybody who will work with this person) in the recruitment, you are giving a strong message that you really value your people and respect their expertise.

So why not watch the programme on “catch up” see what you think. Could you switch to collaborative hiring in your organisation?

About the author – Henry Stewart.

Founder of Happy Ltd. An inspirational speaker dedicated to creating new ways to learn and truly great workplaces. His book, The Happy Manifesto, was published in January 2013 and has been shortlisted for the CMI business book of the year.

Henry speaks from experience: Happy has been rated in the top 20 workplaces in the UK for five successive years (Financial Times / Great Place to Work institute)

In 2011 he was listed in the Guru Radar of the Thinkers50 list of the top 50 business thinkers world-wide. “Henry is one of the thinkers who we believe will shape the future of business”, explains Stuart Crainer, compiler of the Thinkers 50 list of business gurus.

“Imagine a company based around the principle that ‘people work best when they feel good about themselves’”, explains Henry. “Imagine a workplace where, instead of levels of approval, people are trusted to make the key decisions for themselves. Imagine trusting people to work out their own balance of life and work. Imagine a blame-free culture where mistakes are celebrated. Wouldn’t you want to work there?”

Specialties: Training, Presentation, Public Speaking, Radical views on Management, Great Workplaces, Happy Workplaces, Education, Love of Learning

1 Comment
  1. Profile photo of Martin Baker
    Martin Baker 1 year ago

    I watched the Brew Dog programme and to me it highlighted a couple of things.
    Firstly that the recruitment consultant did not listen to the requirements of the company (knowing this was going to be on national TV I find this a little worrying), and secondly, at the beginning of the show, the MD stressed and promised that all decisions would be made by the staff and he would not override this……however, he did!!
    Great idea, but it didn’t work! I didn’t see the other two programmes so can’t comment on them!

Leave a reply

CONTACT US

Please leave your message here and we will get back to you as soon as possible.

Sending

©2017 Learning Professional Network